Biasi v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
| Joseph Biasi |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Earlene Schaeffer, Ryan Dunphy and Rebecca Paukstela |
| 6:2015cv00454 |
| April 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Utica Office |
| Montgomery |
| Andrew T. Baxter |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Other Labor Litigation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
DECISION AND ORDER granting # 36 Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment seeking dismissal of Plaintiff's second cause of action; denying # 46 Plaintiff's Cross-Motion for leave to file a third amended complaint; and denying # 50 Defendant's Motion to Strike certain portions of Plaintiff's declarations that were submitted in opposition to their motion for summary judgment. This case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Baxter for a Rule 16 conference and the setting of pretrial deadlines. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/22/17. (lmw)
|
|
Filing
30
DECISION AND ORDER denying # 6 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's second cause of action in his Second Amended Complaint for Failure to State a Claim. This case is referred back to Magistrate Judge Baxter for a Rule 16 conference and the setting of pretrial scheduling deadlines. Signed by Chief Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/14/16. (lmw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
