Dow et al v. M & T Bank et al
Plaintiff: Annette M. Dow and William G. Schisler, Sr.
Defendant: M & T Bank, Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC and Emery Law
Case Number: 6:2016cv00514
Filed: May 4, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Utica Office
County: Oneida
Presiding Judge: Therese Wiley Dancks
Presiding Judge: David N. Hurd
Nature of Suit: Housing/Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 DECISION & ORDER that the document filed by pltfs as the "amended complaint" (Dkt. No. 14) is STRICKEN as not in compliance with Judge Hurd's January 30, 2018 Order, and thus, the action is still DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY in accordance with Judge Hurd's Order and for failure to file an amended complaint. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 3/9/2018. (Copy served upon William G. Schisler, Sr. and Annette M. Schisler via regular and certified mail on 3/9/2018)(see)
January 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 13 DECISION & ORDER that the 5 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks is accepted in whole; that this action shall be DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) unless, within 30 days of the date of this Decision and Order plt f's file an amended complaint that corrects the pleading defects identified in the Report-Recommendation; that if pltfs file an amended complaint within the referenced 30 day period, then the amended complaint shall be referred to Magistrate Jud ge Baxter for his review; and if, however, pltfs fail to file an amended complaint within the referenced 30 day period, then this action shall be dismissed without further Order. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 1/30/2018. (Copy served upon Annette M. Dow and William G. Schisler, Sr. via regular mail on 1/30/2018)(see)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dow et al v. M & T Bank et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Annette M. Dow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William G. Schisler, Sr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M & T Bank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Emery Law
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?