Ramos v. Rust
| Ivan Ramos |
| Carl J. Rust |
| 6:2016cv01312 |
| November 3, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Utica Office |
| Montgomery |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Frederick J. Scullin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
JUDGMENT: It is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Plaintiff failed to comply fully with the Court's # 14 Order and failed to file a signed amended complaint. Therefore, this action is dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail.] (nmk)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER: that Magistrate Judge Dancks' February 9, 2017 13 Order and Report-Recommendation is Accepted in its entirety for the reasons stated therein; that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, see Dkt. No. 11, is Dismissed with prejudice as again st Defendant Rust; that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint against Defendant Culick is Dismissed without prejudice, but without leave to amend as to his Fourteenth Amendment due process claim; that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint against Defendant Culick is Dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend as to his First Amendment access-to-courts claim; that if Plaintiff wishes to proceed with his First Amendment access-to-courts claim, he must file a signed amended complaint that cures t he pleading defects that Magistrate Judge Dancks identified in her February 9, 2017 Order and Report-Recommendation; that, upon Plaintiff's full compliance with this Order, the Clerk of the Court shall return the file to this Court for further r eview; that, if Plaintiff fails to comply fully with the terms of this Order within thirty (30) days from its filing date, the Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment indicating that this action is Dismissed with prejudice, without further order of t his Court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted and that the Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr on 03/02/2017. (Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail on 3/2/2017.)(hmr)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Dancks' December 8, 2016 Order and Report-Recommendation is ACCEPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. The Court hereby ORDERS that Plaintiff's # 11 amended complaint is REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Dancks for review. Signed by Senior Judge Frederick J. Scullin, Jr. on 2/2/2017. [Copy served upon pro se plaintiff via regular mail.] (nmk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ramos v. Rust | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ivan Ramos | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Carl J. Rust | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
