Bator v. City of Rome, New York
Edward Bator |
City of Rome, New York |
6:2018cv01145 |
September 24, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Therese Wiley Dancks |
Gary L Sharpe |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 American Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
TEXT NOTICE -RESCHEDULING OF RULE 16 CONFERENCE: Due to a conflict on the Court's calendar, the Telephone Initial Conference has been RESCHEDULED for 1/10/2019 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to initiate the call as set forth in General Order 25. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed by 1/3/2019 and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 1/3/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (sg) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City of Rome, New York re #5 Answer to Complaint (Feeney, Gerard) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by City of Rome, New York.(Feeney, Gerard) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Edward Bator. City of Rome, New York served on 10/3/2018, answer due 10/24/2018. (Hartt, James) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 12/27/2018 09:30 AM in Syracuse before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. All conferences are conducted by telephone. Plaintiff's attorney will initiate the call (unless the Court directs differently) and shall contact Judge Dancks' Chambers at 315-234-8618 (a dedicated line solely for telephone conferences) once all parties are on the line. Counsel may use a teleconferencing service for assistance initiating conference calls to the Court. For cases involving pro se parties, the Court will initiate the call for the Rule 16 Conference. Pro se parties are instructed to provide the Court with a telephone number where they may be reached for a conference call. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 12/20/2018. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (khr) Modified on 11/6/2018 (sg, ). |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to City of Rome, New York. (khr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against City of Rome, New York (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4516356)filed by Edward Bator. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(khr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bator v. City of Rome, New York | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Edward Bator | |
Represented By: | James D. Hartt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: City of Rome, New York | |
Represented By: | Gerard F. Feeney, II |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.