Palmer v. Simon's Agency, Inc. et al
| Gary Palmer |
| Does 1-10 and Simon's Agency, Inc. |
| 6:2019cv00114 |
| January 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Frederick J Scullin |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gary Palmer. Simon's Agency, Inc. served on 2/6/2019, answer due 3/28/2019. (Lemberg, Sergei) |
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER Rescheduling Initial Conference: the 5/1/2019 Telephone R. 16 Conference has been RESCHEDULED for 4/10/2019 at 9:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the call as directed in GO 25. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed no later than 4/3/019 and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 4/3/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 3/5/2019. (sg)
|
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER granting Defendant's #5 Letter Request for extension of time to respond to the complaint. Simon's Agency, Inc. answer due 3/28/2019. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 3/1/2019. (sg)
|
| CLERK'S CORRECTION OF DOCKET ENTRY re: Dkt. No. #5 : This document was incorrectly filed as a formal motion for extension of time to respond to the complaint. However, this is a letter request/motion for extension that does not require a formal return date and briefing schedule. The court will address Dkt. No. #5 in due course. The event and docket text have been corrected accordingly. (sg ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Grant Jubelt on behalf of Simon's Agency, Inc. (Jubelt, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 Letter Request/Motion for extension of time for defendant to respond to complaint submitted to Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks by Simon's Agency, Inc. (Lickstein, Steven) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven D. Lickstein on behalf of Simon's Agency, Inc. (Lickstein, Steven) |
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 5/1/2019 at 09:30 AM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 4/24/2019. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (see) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Simon's Agency, Inc. (see) |
| TEXT NOTICE: Although the plaintiff herein has named Does 1-10 in the Complaint, the Clerk's Office will not issue summonses for service of process on a "Doe" defendants at this time. In the event plaintiff wishes to pursue the claims against these defendants, plaintiff shall take reasonable steps to ascertain their identities. When plaintiff determines the identity of the "Doe 1-10" defendants, plaintiff may seek to amend the pleading to add the properly named defendants pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 15 and summons will be issued at that time. (see) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Does 1-10 and Simon's Agency, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4630168) filed by Gary Palmer. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(see) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
