Morgan v. City of Utica, New York
Plaintiff: Peter R. Morgan
Defendant: City of Utica, New York
Case Number: 6:2020cv01424
Filed: November 19, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Mae A D'Agostino
Referring Judge: Miroslav Lovric
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 TEXT ORDER: In light of Text Order 15 , the Rule 16 initial conference scheduled for 1/27/2021, the fling of a Civil Case Management Plan, and the exchange of mandatory disclosures, are STAYED without date. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric on 1/15/2021. (Copy served on Pro Se Plaintiff via regular mail)(jdp )
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 TEXT ORDER granting #11 Letter Motion from Zachary C. Oren for City of Utica, New York requesting permission to file a FRCP 12 (b) (6) motion against Plaintiff's Complaint: It is hereby ORDERED that the #11 defendant's request for leave to file a motion to dismiss is GRANTED; The motion shall be filed on or before 2/16/21, and shall be made returnable before Judge D'Agostino On Submit - no personal appearances will be necessary. The motion will be decided on the submission of the papers. Once the motion to dismiss is filed, defense counsel is directed to serve a copy of the motion upon the plaintiff and file a corresponding certificate of service. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 1/14/21. (Copy served via regular mail upon plaintiff)(ban)
January 14, 2021 Opinion or Order TEXT Minute Entry for Telephone Pre-Motion Conference held on 1/14/2021 before U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino: Appearances by Zachary Oren, Esq. for the defendant; The Plaintiff did not dial-in; Judge D'Agostino waits 5 minutes to give the pro se plaintiff, Peter Morgan, time to dial-in for the conference call. The plaintiff never dialed-in. Judge D'Agostino informs defense counsel that her Courtroom Deputy will try to contact the plaintiff to re-schedule this conference call for later today. She further stated that, if we don't hear from the plaintiff by 5:00 p.m. today, the Court will issue an order addressing defendant's request for leave to file a motion to dismiss. (Court Reporter Jacqueline Stroffolino, CRD Britney Norton [Time 9:30 a.m. - 9:36 a.m.]) (ban)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City of Utica, New York re #13 Letter Motion from Zachary C. Oren for City of Utica, New York requesting a stay of the FRCP 16 conference, FRCP 26 initial disclosures, and Civil Case Management Plan deadlines pending the outcome of potential dispositive motion practice s (Oren, Zachary)
December 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Letter Motion from Zachary C. Oren for City of Utica, New York requesting a stay of the FRCP 16 conference, FRCP 26 initial disclosures, and Civil Case Management Plan deadlines pending the outcome of potential dispositive motion practice submitted to Judge Lovric . (Oren, Zachary)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City of Utica, New York re #11 Letter Motion from Zachary C. Oren for City of Utica, New York requesting permission to file a FRCP 12 (b) (6) motion against Plaintiff's Complaint submitted to Judge D'Agostino (Oren, Zachary)
December 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Letter Motion from Zachary C. Oren for City of Utica, New York requesting permission to file a FRCP 12 (b) (6) motion against Plaintiff's Complaint submitted to Judge D'Agostino . (Oren, Zachary)
December 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 TEXT ORDER: NEW TELEPHONE CONFERENCING INFORMATION -- the Courts teleconferencing number and access code have been changed. For all scheduled telephone conferences with the Court, the parties are directed to dial 877-402-9753 and enter access code 9983518. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric on 12/10/2020. (Served on Pro Se Plaintiff via regular mail) (jdp )
November 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 TEXT ORDER: Letter Motion #7 is GRANTED. Defendant is directed to file an answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint by December 28, 2020. The Rule 16 initial conference currently scheduled for 1/6/2021, is re-scheduled for 1/27/2021 at 10:00 a.m., via telephone conference before Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric. The parties are directed to call (877) 336-1839 and enter access code 5177238. The Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 1/20/2021. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric on 11/23/2020. (Copy of text order mailed to pro se Plaintiff) (jdp )
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by City of Utica, New York re #1 Notice of Removal, #6 Status Report, #7 Letter Motion from Zachary C. Oren for City of Utica, New York requesting an approximate thirty (30) day extension to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint submitted to Judge Lovric (Oren, Zachary)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Letter Motion from Zachary C. Oren for City of Utica, New York requesting an approximate thirty (30) day extension to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint submitted to Judge Lovric . (Oren, Zachary)
November 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STATUS REPORT on Notice of Removal (per Judge's Rules) by City of Utica, New York. (Oren, Zachary)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 TEXT-ONLY NOTICE REGARDING JUDGE D'AGOSTINO CASE DISPOSITION PILOT - Please refer to the Individual Rules and Practices of the Hon. Mae A. D'Agostino, U.S. District Judge, for guidance regarding the Case Disposition Pilot. https://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/sites/nynd/files/MAD_Rules_of_Practice_04_14_2020.pdf. (see)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE mailed to pltf on 11/19/2020 by regular mail. (see)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 1/6/2021 02:30 PM by telephone before Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 12/30/2020. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) {Copy mailed to pro se pltf on 11/19/2020}(see)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 STATE COURT SUMMONS and COMPLAINT relating to #1 Notice of Removal. (see)
November 19, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from New York State Supreme Court, Oneida County, case number CA2020-2316 (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-5322581) filed by City of Utica, New York. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(see)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morgan v. City of Utica, New York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Utica, New York
Represented By: Zachary Oren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Peter R. Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?