Woods v. Pilgrim USA, LLC
| Travis Woods |
| Pilgrim USA, LLC |
| 6:2022cv00699 |
| June 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| David N Hurd |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 American Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER granting Defendant's #6 Letter Request for extension of time for defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint. Pilgrim USA, LLC answer due 8/31/2022. The Rule 16 Conference and associated deadlines remain as previously scheduled. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 7/25/2022. (sg)
|
| Filing 6 Letter Motion from Zachary C. Oren for Pilgrim USA, LLC requesting a thirty (30) day extension to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint submitted to Judge Dancks . (Oren, Zachary) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Zachary C. Oren on behalf of Pilgrim USA, LLC (Oren, Zachary) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Travis Woods. Pilgrim USA, LLC served on 7/11/2022, answer due 8/1/2022. (Bizer, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 9/28/2022 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 9/21/2022. All conferences are conducted by telephone. Plaintiff's attorney will initiate the call (unless the Court directs differently) and shall contact Judge Dancks' Chambers at 315-234-8618(a dedicated line solely for telephone conferences) once all parties are on the line. Counsel may use a teleconferencing service for assistance initiating conference calls to the Court. For cases involving pro se parties, the Court will initiate the call for the Rule 16 Conference. Pro se parties are instructed to provide the Court with a telephone number where they may be reached for a conference call. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (mgh) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Pilgrim USA, LLC. (mgh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pilgrim USA, LLC (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-5954532) filed by Travis Woods. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(mgh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Woods v. Pilgrim USA, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Travis Woods | |
| Represented By: | Andrew D. Bizer |
| Represented By: | Garret S. DeReus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Pilgrim USA, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Zachary C. Oren |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
