Beilby v. Miller et al
| Mark A. Beilby |
| Jeffrey Miller and State of New York |
| 6:2023cv00328 |
| March 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Therese Wiley Dancks |
| Thomas J McAvoy |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Letter Request, State of New York answer due 6/5/2023. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 4/21/2023. (jcl)
|
| Filing 9 Letter Motion from Aimee Cowan for State of New York requesting 30-day extension to answer Plaintiff's complaint submitted to Judge Therese Wiley Dancks . (Cowan, Aimee) |
| ***Answer due date updated for State of New York: answer due 6/05/2023.(jcl) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on State of New York c/o NYS Police Headquarters on 04/13/2023, filed by Mark A. Beilby. (Sussman, Michael) |
| ***Answer due date updated for State of New York: answer due 5/04/2023. (jcl) |
|
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER: Court reviewed Dkt. No. #6 , which is identical to Dkt. No. #4 . The affidavit of service is unclear on its face as to which party is being served, and this must be corrected. Changing the text in the docketing entry is insufficient. Therefore, plaintiff must file an amended affidavit of service before an answer deadline will be set for any party to respond. Plaintiff should submit an amended affidavit of service by 4/17/2023, and the affidavit must state on its face the exact party purported to be served. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 4/11/2023. (sg)
|
| Filing 6 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on State of New York c/o NYS Police Headquarters on 03/22/2023, filed by Mark A. Beilby. (Sussman, Michael) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER: Court reviewed affidavit of service (Dkt. No. #4 ) which is unclear as to which defendant was served. Plaintiff to file amended affidavit of service by 4/11/2023 which explicitly states which defendant was served. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 3/30/2023. (sg)
|
| Filing 4 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons, Complaint, Civil Case Assignment, and Filing Order served on NYS Police Headquarters on 03/22/2023, filed by Mark A. Beilby. (Sussman, Michael) |
| Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Rule 16 Conference set for 6/13/2023 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 6/6/2023. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (ztc) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Jeffrey Miller. (Attachments: #1 Summons issued as to State of New York)(ztc) |
| TEXT NOTICE OF FILING DEFICIENCY as to Mark A. Beilby regarding the #1 Complaint NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of the following Filing Deficiency: Counsel has checked off Jury Demand on the Civil Cover Sheet, but the Jury Demand is not noted in the Pleading, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 38. Failure to file a Demand for Jury Trial pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 38 constitutes a waiver of a jury trial. (ztc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jeffrey Miller and State of New York (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-6229148) filed by Mark A. Beilby. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ztc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
