Pomichter v. Kijakazi
Brenda M. Pomichter |
Kilolo Kijakazi |
6:2023cv01121 |
September 1, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Mae A D'Agostino |
Therese Wiley Dancks |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER denying #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis of Brenda Pomichter: Court reviewed plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 3) which is denied without prejudice because the application is incomplete. Plaintiff should submit a revised application that completely responds to paragraph 3 including subpart (f), or pay the filing fee, by 9/29/2023. Failure to do so may result in an administrative closure of the case. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks on 9/6/2023. (sg) |
Payment of Civil Filing Fee $402, receipt number ANYNDC-6436756 by Brenda M. Pomichter . (Goldstein, Justin) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF INITIAL ATTORNEY APPEARANCE - COMMISSIONER: Geoffrey M. Peters appearing for Commissioner of Social Security. Social Security Administrative Transcript due by 12/4/2023. (Peters, Geoffrey) |
Filing 5 SOCIAL SECURITY CONSENT / DECLINATION FORM filed by Brenda M. Pomichter advising of declination of consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (ztc) |
Filing 4 General Order #18 Issued. (ztc) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Brenda M. Pomichter. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Therese Wiley Dancks. (ztc) |
Filing 2 Social Security Identification Form [LODGED] [Pursuant to General Order #18, this document has been electronically lodged with the Court. Viewable by case participants and court personnel only, it is not a filed document, therefore is not available for public inspection. Any further distribution or dissemination is prohibited]. (ztc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT - Social Security Appeal. [Pursuant to General Order #18, Section B(3), the CM/ECF system will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing to the USAO-NDNY and Regional Counsel for the Social Security Administration. Service of a Complaint along with the Social Security Identification Form will be considered complete only when the three steps in paragraph 2(A), 2(B) and 2(C) of General Order #18 have been completed.]. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Notice of Decision Unfavorable, #2 Exhibit B- Notice of Appeals Council Action, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ztc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Pomichter v. Kijakazi | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brenda M. Pomichter | |
Represented By: | Justin M. Goldstein |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kilolo Kijakazi | |
Represented By: | Geoffrey M. Peters |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.