McLaughlin v. Pezzolla et al
Case Number: 7:2006cv00376
Filed: March 23, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Watertown Office
Presiding Judge: George H. Lowe
Presiding Judge: Thomas J. McAvoy
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 115 DECISION AND ORDER denying Defendants' 110 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 3/4/2010. (amt)
January 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 109 AMENDED DECISION AND ORDER: Amends Court's 108 Order to correctly reflect the Plaintiff's first name; In all other respects this Decision and Order is identical to the 108 Decision and Order. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 1/4/10. (amt)
December 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 108 DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defts' 87 and 89 Motions for Summary Judgment; Summary Judgment as to Pltf's claims are GRANTED as to OMRDD, McGrath, Pezzolla, Martin, and Colarusso and DENIED as to CAB, Broderick, Ferguson, Nehrbauer and Turner. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 12/17/2009. (amt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McLaughlin v. Pezzolla et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?