Crump v. Barnhart
Case Number: 7:2006cv01003
Filed: August 21, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Watertown Office
Presiding Judge: David R. Homer
Presiding Judge: Norman A. Mordue
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 CONSENT ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT re 14 Stipulation filed by Randall G. Crump. The plaintiff's be paid a fee award in the amount of Five Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty-Eight dollars ($5,868.00) for EAJA fees and expenses, and Three-Hundred and Fifty dollars ($350.00) for costs. Signed by Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue on 10/9/09. (mnm)
August 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM, DECISION AND ORDER - the decision denying disability benefits be reversed and this matter be remanded to the Commissioner solely for the calculation and payment of benefits and pursuant to General Order #32, the parties are advised that t he referral to a Magistrate Judge as provided for Under L.R. 72.3 has been rescinded, as such, any appeal taken from this Order will be to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment in this case. Signed by Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue on 8/5/09. (mnm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Crump v. Barnhart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?