Crump v. Barnhart
7:2006cv01003 |
August 21, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Watertown Office |
David R. Homer |
Norman A. Mordue |
Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 CONSENT ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT re 14 Stipulation filed by Randall G. Crump. The plaintiff's be paid a fee award in the amount of Five Thousand Eight Hundred and Sixty-Eight dollars ($5,868.00) for EAJA fees and expenses, and Three-Hundred and Fifty dollars ($350.00) for costs. Signed by Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue on 10/9/09. (mnm) |
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM, DECISION AND ORDER - the decision denying disability benefits be reversed and this matter be remanded to the Commissioner solely for the calculation and payment of benefits and pursuant to General Order #32, the parties are advised that t he referral to a Magistrate Judge as provided for Under L.R. 72.3 has been rescinded, as such, any appeal taken from this Order will be to the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and the Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment in this case. Signed by Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue on 8/5/09. (mnm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Crump v. Barnhart | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.