Pollard v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Northern District Pollard v. Commissioner of Social Security

Pollard v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Penny Pollard
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	7:2007cv00440
Filed:	April 24, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Watertown Office
County:	St. Lawrence
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence E. Kahn
Presiding Judge:	David E. Peebles
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 14, 2009	Filing 24 DECISION AND ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 16 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED. ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 7/14/09. (ban)
May 27, 2009	Filing 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: as to the # 1 Complaint filed by Penny Pollard. It is RECOMMENDED that defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings be Granted, that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings be Denied and that the d ecision of the Commissioner be Affirmed. It is ORDERED that any objections to this R&R must be filed by 6/10/2009. Failure to timely file objections or to request an extension of time to do so, waives the right to appeal any subsequent order by the District Judge adopting the Recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 5/27/2009. (mae)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 14, 2009

Filing 24 DECISION AND ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 16 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED. ORDERED that the decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 7/14/09. (ban)

May 27, 2009

Filing 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: as to the # 1 Complaint filed by Penny Pollard. It is RECOMMENDED that defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings be Granted, that plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings be Denied and that the d ecision of the Commissioner be Affirmed. It is ORDERED that any objections to this R&R must be filed by 6/10/2009. Failure to timely file objections or to request an extension of time to do so, waives the right to appeal any subsequent order by the District Judge adopting the Recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 5/27/2009. (mae)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pollard v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Penny Pollard
Represented By:	Lawrence D. Hasseler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By:	Dennis J. Canning
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?