Redmond v. Commissioner of Social Security

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Northern District Redmond v. Commissioner of Social Security

Redmond v. Commissioner of Social Security

Plaintiff:	Tara Redmond
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number:	7:2007cv00494
Filed:	May 8, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Watertown Office
County:	St. Lawrence
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence E. Kahn
Presiding Judge:	Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 30, 2009	Filing 22 DECISION & ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 21) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion on the pleadings is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion on the pleadings is DENIED and the decision of the commissioner is AFFIRMED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 7/30/09. (sas)
July 13, 2009	Filing 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be Granted, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be Denied, and the decision of the Commissioner be Affirmed. It is ORDERED that any objections to this Report & Recommendation must be filed by 7/27/2009. Failure to timely object or request an extension of time to object waives the right to appeal any subsequent Order by the District Court adopting the Recommendations contained herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 7/13/2009. (mae)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 30, 2009

Filing 22 DECISION & ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 21) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion on the pleadings is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion on the pleadings is DENIED and the decision of the commissioner is AFFIRMED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 7/30/09. (sas)

July 13, 2009

Filing 21 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: It is RECOMMENDED that Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be Granted, Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be Denied, and the decision of the Commissioner be Affirmed. It is ORDERED that any objections to this Report & Recommendation must be filed by 7/27/2009. Failure to timely object or request an extension of time to object waives the right to appeal any subsequent Order by the District Court adopting the Recommendations contained herein. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 7/13/2009. (mae)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Redmond v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tara Redmond
Represented By:	Lawrence D. Hasseler
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?