Cox v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Kim A. Cox
Defendant: United States of America
Case Number: 7:2007cv01085
Filed: October 15, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Watertown Office
County: St. Lawrence
Presiding Judge: Gustave J. DiBianco
Presiding Judge: Thomas J. McAvoy
Nature of Suit: Agriculture Acts
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 11 DECISION AND ORDER granting 7 Motion for Summary Judgment; Deft is entitled to judgment in the amount of $1,830.14. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 1/12/09. (amt)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cox v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kim A. Cox
Represented By: Charles A. Gardner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: William F. Larkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?