Car-Freshner Corporation et al v. Air Fresheners, Inc. et al
| Car-Freshner Corporation and Julius Samann Ltd |
| Air Fresheners, Inc. and Slawomir M. Warzocha |
| 7:2010cv01491 |
| December 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Watertown Office |
| Jefferson |
| George H. Lowe |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
JUDGMENT in favor of Car-Freshner Corporation, Julius Samann Ltd. against Air Fresheners, Inc., Slawomir M. Warzocha. (lmw)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 14 Motion for Default Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 22 Motion to Strike; granting in part and denying in part 21 motion to set aside the Clerk's entry of default. Defts' default as to Count VIII of the Complaint is SET ASIDE. Defts' answer is STRICKEN, except for those parts that apply to Count VIII of the Complaint; Defts shall by 10/1/12 file with the Court a report setting forth how they have complied with the terms of this Order. Pltfs' shall file with the Court briefing papers with calculations of an award of damages, atty's fees and costs and inform the Court if they wish to continue to prosecute Count VIII of their Complaint by 8/25/12. Defts' shall file a supplemental brief on the above described issues by 9/9/12. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 8/10/12. (sfp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
