Brozzo v. U.S. Department of Education
||U.S. Department of Education
||December 29, 2014
||US District Court for the Northern District of New York
||Therese Wiley Dancks
||Lawrence E. Kahn
|Nature of Suit:
||Freedom of Information Act
|Cause of Action:
||05 U.S.C. § 552
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 11, 2017
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDERED, that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 54-1) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 55) is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is DISMISSED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on May 11, 2017. (Copy served via regular and certified mail)(sas)
|September 9, 2016
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Letter Request (Dkt. No. 51) is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 28) is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendant is permitted to move f or summary judgment within ninety (90) days of the date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order. In the event that Defendant moves for summary judgment, Plaintiff is permitted to cross-move for summary judgment along with his response; in the event tha t Defendant does not move for summary judgment, Plaintiff will have thirty (30) days after the expiration of the ninety-day period to move for summary judgment. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on September 09, 2016.***A copy of this Order was served upon pro se party via US Mail. (sas)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?