DeCarlo v. Barnhardt
Case Number: 8:2006cv00488
Filed: April 19, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Plattsburgh Office
Presiding Judge: Lawrence E. Kahn
Presiding Judge: Randolph F. Treece
Nature of Suit: Social Security: RSI Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 16 DECISION and ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 15) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED; Defendants Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and the Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is REMANDED to the Commissioner for a calculation of benefits. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on June 17, 2009. (sas)
May 28, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings ge GRANTED, and Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings be DENIED, the # 1 Complaint filed by Jennifer DeCarlo should be REMANDED to the Commissioner for a calculation of benefits. Objections to R&R due by 6/11/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Victor E. Bianchini on 5/28/09. (jmb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DeCarlo v. Barnhardt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?