OneBeacon America Insurance Company v. Comsec Ventures International, Inc. et al
OneBeacon America Insurance Company |
Comsec Ventures International, Inc. and Mahoney Notify-Plus, Inc. |
8:2007cv00900 |
August 31, 2007 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Plattsburgh Office |
Essex |
Gary L. Sharpe |
Randolph F. Treece |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 66 Motion for Reconsideration filed by Mahoney Notify-Plus, Inc. Signed by Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 3/19/2010. (sg) |
Filing 64 Memorandum-Decision and Order: IT IS HEREBY: ORDERED, that OneBeacon's 62 Motion for leave to file a surreply is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that Mahoney's 53 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to OneBeacon's claims f or breach of contract, breach of warranty, negligent misrepresentation and consumer fraud, and the claims are therefore DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED, that Mahoney's 53 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to OneBeacon's neglig ence claim; and it is further ORDERED, that Comsec's Motion seeking dismissal of Mahoney's cross-claims is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Comsec's Motion seeking attorney's fees is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 1/7/2010. (sg ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.