Gonzalez Juanes et al v. Lyzwinski et al
| Juan A. Gonzalez Juanes and Executive Express Aviation S.A. de C.V. |
| Marek Lyzwinski and Southern Winds Aviation, LLC |
| 8:2010cv00459 |
| April 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Plattsburgh Office |
| Clinton |
| Glenn T. Suddaby |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM-DECISION, ORDER, AND JUDGMENT: DENYING defendants' 69 Motion to vacate the 58 Order enforcing the Settlement Agreement and Release; DENYING defendants' application for sanctions and attorneys fees in connection with its earlier 53 motion to enforce the settlement agreement; Warning DEFENDANT MAREK LYZWINSKI THAT FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER AND THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS AGAINST HIM AND/OR A FINDING OF CONTEMPT; and DISMISSING this action based on the enforceable settlement agreement in effect pursuant to the procedure set forth in N.D.N.Y.L.R. 68.2(a). Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 7/12/2013. [Copy served upon attorney Brent L. Vannoy via regular mail] (mae)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying Pltfs' 29 Partial Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 6/22/12. (sfp, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
