Fountain v. United States of America et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|September 23, 2015
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER. ORDERED that Karim's cross claim, Dkt. No. 52 , and his motion demanding certification, Dkt. No. 55 , are DENIED and dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; ORDERED that Karim's motion for declar atory judgment, Dkt. No. 73 , is DENIED; ORDERED that all claims against the United States and U.S. Department of Agriculture in 8:13-cv-255, are dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction; and ORDERED that the United States' motion, Dkt . No. 75 , to dismiss 3:14-cv-964, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is GRANTED, and the case is dismissed in its entirety on the merits; ORDERED that Fountain's cross-motion, Dkt. No. 79 , for partial summary judgment in 8:13-cv-255, is DENIED without prejudice to an action in New York States courts; and any relief Fountain seeks against the United States in either 8:13-cv-255 or 3:14-cv-964 is DENIED with prejudice. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to close both cases. Signed by Senior Judge Norman A. Mordue on 9/23/2015. (lah)
|September 30, 2014
DECISION and ORDER re 51 Status Report filed by United States of America and United States Department of Agriculture, 58 Response to Letter Brief filed by Anwar M. Karim. Karim seeks an additional deposition to support his petition and pr ospective motion for declaratory relief. The requested additional deposition pertains solely to the scope of employment. Determining the scope of employment here is a depositive decision which rests solely with a district judge as opposed to a magistrate judge. See Dkt. No. 50 . The Court DENIES Karim's application as premature and outside the Court's province to grant at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece on 9/30/2014. (lah)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?