Levesque v. Dominy
||March 17, 2014
||New York Northern District Court
||Christian F. Hummel
||Gary L. Sharpe
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|April 28, 2015
MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER - That Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel's August 4, 2014 11 Report-Recommendation and Order is ADOPTED in its entirety. That Levesque's 8 and 9 amended complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. That Levesque's 14 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. That the Clerk close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 4/28/2015. (jel, )
|April 24, 2014
ORDER - ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel filed March 21, 2014 (Dkt. No. 3) is ADOPTED IN PART as follows; and it is further ORDERED that, if plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he must fil e an amended complaint, which complies the terms of the Report-Recommendation and Order, within thirty (30) days from the filing date of this Order; and it is further ORDERED that, upon the filing of an amended complaint, the Clerk shall return the file to the Court for further review; and it is further ORDERED that should plaintiff fail to comply with the terms of this Order, within the time period specified above, this action shall be DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failure to comply with the pleading standards and to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and/or as frivolous. Signed by Chief Judge Gary L. Sharpe on 4/24/2014. (jel, )
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?