Marsh-Godreau v. SUNY College at Potsdam

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Northern District Marsh-Godreau v. SUNY College at Potsdam

Marsh-Godreau v. SUNY College at Potsdam

Plaintiff:	Bonnie Marsh-Godreau
Defendant:	SUNY College at Potsdam
Case Number:	8:2015cv00437
Filed:	April 13, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Plattsburgh Office
County:	Franklin
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence E. Kahn
Presiding Judge:	Christian F. Hummel
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 28, 2017	Filing 57 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting 49 Motion for Summary Judgment: It is hereby ORDERED, that Defendants Motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 49) is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 11/28/2017. (ban)
March 11, 2016	Filing 21 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 19) to amend is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 19-4) is now the operative pleading in this action; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 15) for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on March 11, 2016. (sas) (Main Document 21 replaced on 3/11/2016) (sas, ).

Date Filed

Document Text

November 28, 2017

Filing 57 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER granting 49 Motion for Summary Judgment: It is hereby ORDERED, that Defendants Motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 49) is GRANTED, and the case is DISMISSED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court serve a copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 11/28/2017. (ban)

March 11, 2016

Filing 21 MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDERED, that Plaintiffs Motion (Dkt. No. 19) to amend is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 19-4) is now the operative pleading in this action; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants Motion (Dkt. No. 15) for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED as moot. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on March 11, 2016. (sas) (Main Document 21 replaced on 3/11/2016) (sas, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marsh-Godreau v. SUNY College at Potsdam
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bonnie Marsh-Godreau
Represented By:	Ryan C. Woodworth
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: SUNY College at Potsdam
Represented By:	Joshua E. McMahon
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?