Gemmell v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Duncan Gemmell
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Case Number: 8:2016cv01014
Filed: August 16, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Plattsburgh Office
County: Essex
Presiding Judge: Andrew T. Baxter
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM-DECISION & ORDER that pltf's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 17) is GRANTED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further consideration; and that the deft's cross motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. Nos. 20, 21) is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christian F. Hummel on 8/2/2017. (see)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gemmell v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Duncan Gemmell
Represented By: Mark A. Schneider
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn Colvin
Represented By: Heetano Shamsoondar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?