Zhu v. The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| Guangwei Zhu |
| The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and The United States Department of Homeland Security |
| 8:2018cv00602 |
| May 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Plattsburgh Office |
| Clinton |
| David N Hurd |
| Daniel J Stewart |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1447 Immigration: Review of Denial of Naturalization Application |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
PRO SE HANDBOOK and NOTICE issued (Notice and Pro Se Packet were mailed to Guangwei Zhu on 5/22/2018.) (hmr)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Guangwei Zhu. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons for United States Attorney General, #2 Proposed Summons for U.S. Attorney's Office, #3 Proposed Summons for The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, #4 Proposed Summons for The United States Department of Homeland Security) Motions referred to Daniel J. Stewart. (hmr)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, The United States Department of Homeland Security filed by Guangwei Zhu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Mailing Envelope)(hmr)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
