Lidstone et al v. Cone Machinery, Inc.
Plaintiff: Alice Wilbanks and Shiloh Lidstone
Defendant: Cone Machinery, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2018cv01144
Filed: September 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Presiding Judge: David N Hurd
Referring Judge: Daniel J Stewart
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2018 Filing 9 Letter Motion from Christopher J. Martin for Cone Machinery, Inc. requesting Rescheduling Initial Court Conference submitted to Judge Daniel J. Stewart . (Martin, Christopher)
November 7, 2018 Filing 8 FRCP 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Cone Machinery, Inc.. (Martin, Christopher)
November 7, 2018 Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Cone Machinery, Inc..(Martin, Christopher)
October 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 TEXT ORDER granting Defendant's #5 Letter Request seeking an extension of time to file a response to the Complaint in this matter. Defendant Cone Machinery, Inc. shall file a response on or before November 12, 2018. SO ORDERED by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart on 10/12/2018. (mab)
October 11, 2018 Filing 5 Letter Motion from Christopher J. Martin for Cone Machinery, Inc. requesting Extension for Time to Respond to Complaint submitted to Judge Daniel J. Stewart . (Martin, Christopher)
October 11, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher J. Martin on behalf of Cone Machinery, Inc. (Martin, Christopher)
September 24, 2018 Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 12/26/2018 at 09:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 12/19/2018. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (see)
September 24, 2018 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Cone Machinery, Inc. (see)
September 20, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Cone Machinery, Inc. (Filing fee $400 receipt number ANYNDC-4514252) filed by Shiloh Lidstone and Alice Wilbanks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(see)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lidstone et al v. Cone Machinery, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alice Wilbanks
Represented By: Michelle Ellsworth Rudderow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shiloh Lidstone
Represented By: Michelle Ellsworth Rudderow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cone Machinery, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher J. Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?