Laughlin v. Law RN
Kevin R. Laughlin |
Rebecca Law, RN |
8:2023cv00432 |
April 5, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Mae A D'Agostino |
Anne M Nardacci |
Daniel J Stewart |
Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
Filing 9 Letter Motion from John L. Murad, Jr., Esq. for Rebecca Law, RN requesting Adjournment of response to Complaint to 5/31/23 submitted to Judge Daniel J. Stewart . (Murad, John) |
***Answer due date updated for Rebecca Law, RN answer due 5/9/2023. (hmr) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complatint served on Rebecca Law, RN on 4/18/2023, filed by Kevin R. Laughlin. (Bailey, John) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER OF RECUSAL. U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino recused. Case reassigned to U.S. District Judge Anne M. Nardacci for all further proceedings. Judge Daniel J. Stewart remains as the assigned Magistrate Judge. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 04/28/2023. (ban, ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by John L. Murad, Jr on behalf of Rebecca Law, RN (Murad, John) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting Direct Assignment. The cases 8:23-cv-205 MAD/DJS and 8:23-cr-432 MAD/DJS are deemed related. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 04/07/2023. (ban) |
Filing 4 TEXT-ONLY NOTICE REGARDING JUDGE D'AGOSTINO CASE DISPOSITION PILOT - Please refer to the Individual Rules and Practices of the Hon. Mae A. D'Agostino, U.S. District Judge, for guidance regarding the Case Disposition Pilot. https://www.nynd.uscourts.gov/sites/nynd/files/MAD_Rules_of_Practice_04_14_2020.pdf. (hmr) |
Filing 3 G.O. 25 FILING ORDER ISSUED: Initial Conference set for 7/5/2023 at 11:00 AM in Albany before Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Stewart. Civil Case Management Plan must be filed and Mandatory Disclosures are to be exchanged by the parties on or before 6/28/2023. (Pursuant to Local Rule 26.2, mandatory disclosures are to be exchanged among the parties but are NOT to be filed with the Court.) (hmr) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Rebecca Law, RN. (hmr) |
TEXT Notice pursuant to General Order 12 of Potential Related Case(s), submitted to District Judge for review and determination. Potential Related cases: 8:23-CV-0205. (hmr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Rebecca Law, RN (Filing fee $402 receipt number ANYNDC-6253595) filed by Kevin R. Laughlin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Certificate of Merit)(hmr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Laughlin v. Law RN | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kevin R. Laughlin | |
Represented By: | John W. Bailey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Rebecca Law, RN | |
Represented By: | John L. Murad, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.