Benjamin v. O'Malley
Charles Benjamin |
Martin O'Malley |
8:2024cv01232 |
October 8, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Miroslav Lovric |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF by Charles Benjamin. Defendant Brief due by 1/9/2025. (Schneider, Mark) |
![]() |
Filing 13 Consent Letter Motion from Mark Schneider for Charles Benjamin requesting Additional Pages for Social Security Appeal Brief submitted to Judge Lovric . (Schneider, Mark) |
Filing 12 Social Security Administrative Record / Transcript. Plaintiff Brief due by 1/6/2025. (Attachments: #1 Transcript 002 Court Transcript Index, #2 Transcript 003 Documents Related to Administrative Process Including Transcript of Oral Hearing, if applicable, #3 Transcript 004 Payment Documents and Decisions, #4 Transcript 005 Jurisdictional Documents and Notices, #5 Transcript 006 Non Disability Related Development, #6 Transcript 007 Disability Related Development, #7 Transcript 008 Medical Records Part 1, #8 Transcript 009 Medical Records Part 2)(Peck, Jason) |
![]() |
Reset Deadline: Social Security Administrative Transcript due by 12/6/2024. (jdc) |
Filing 10 CONSENT Letter Motion from Jason Peck for Martin O'Malley requesting this Court strike the record/transcript filed at ECF No. 9 so the Commissioner may then file a corrected record submitted to Judge Miroslav Lovric . (Peck, Jason) |
Filing 9 ***STRICKEN PURSUANT TO THE COURTS 11 ORDER*** Social Security Administrative Record / Transcript. Plaintiff Brief due by 12/30/2024. (Attachments: #1 Transcript Part 2 of 9, #2 Transcript Part 3 of 9, #3 Transcript Part 4 of 9, #4 Transcript Part 5 of 9, #5 Transcript Part 6 of 9, #6 Transcript Part 7 of 9, #7 Transcript Part 8 of 9, #8 Transcript Part 9 of 9)(Peck, Jason) Modified on 11/19/2024 (jdc ). |
Filing 8 SOCIAL SECURITY CONSENT / DECLINATION FORM filed by Charles Benjamin advising of consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (Schneider, Mark) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER: Defendant is directed to produce a Social Security Administrative Record/Transcript such that the bookmarks in the Social Security Administrative Record/Transcript are complete, in that, the entire transcript is linked to the index. The defendant shall produce a transcript that includes bookmarks for all of the exhibits in the administrative record, including all of the medical records. SO ORDERED by U.S. Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric on 10/9/2024. (jdc ) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF INITIAL ATTORNEY APPEARANCE - COMMISSIONER: Jason P. Peck appearing for Commissioner of Social Security. Social Security Administrative Transcript due by 1/7/2025. (Peck, Jason) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER: Having considered the application to proceed without prepayment of fees under 28 U.S.C. 1915, Plaintiff's #3 in forma pauperis application is GRANTED. Pursuant to General Order No. 18 of this District, Defendant shall file a certified transcript of the administrative proceedings, which shall constitute Defendant's answer, within 90 days of said service, or a motion to dismiss the Complaint within 90 days of said service. SO ORDERED by U.S. Magistrate Judge Miroslav Lovric on 10/8/2024. (jdc ) |
Filing 4 Social Security Appeal Case Assignment Form and General Order #18 Issued. Pursuant to General Order #18, in the event the Plaintiff does not timely consent, or if the United States timely withdraws its consent, the case will be reassigned to a District Judge consistent with General Order #12. Social Security Consent/Declination Form due by 10/29/2024. (hmr) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Charles Benjamin. (hmr) |
Filing 2 Social Security Identification Form [LODGED] [Pursuant to General Order #18, this document has been electronically lodged with the Court. Viewable by case participants and court personnel only, it is not a filed document, therefore is not available for public inspection. Any further distribution or dissemination is prohibited]. (hmr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT - Social Security Appeal. [Pursuant to General Order #18, Section B(3), the CM/ECF system will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing to the USAO-NDNY and Regional Counsel for the Social Security Administration. Service of a Complaint along with the Social Security Identification Form will be considered complete only when the three steps in paragraph 2(A), 2(B) and 2(C) of General Order #18 have been completed.]. (Attachments: #1 ALJ Decision, #2 Appeals Council Decision, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(hmr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Benjamin v. O'Malley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Martin O'Malley | |
Represented By: | Jason P. Peck |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Charles Benjamin | |
Represented By: | Mark A. Schneider |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.