Gill v. Calescibetta, et al

Gill v. Calescibetta, et al

Case Number:	9:2000cv01553
Filed:	October 11, 2000
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Prisoner Office
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence E. Kahn
Presiding Judge:	David E. Peebles
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2009	Filing 103 ORDER that 102 Report and Recommendations is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. ORDERED that plaintiff's retaliation claim relating to his termination from emp loyment in the prison mess hall survive Defendants' motion for summary judgment and be referred for trial, along with Plaintiff's two retaliation claims relating to his keeplock confinement. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/31/09. {order served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas)
March 11, 2009	Filing 102 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. RECOMMENDED that 45 Motion for Summary Judgment to the extent that it relates to the remaining retaliation claims, be GRANTED, in part, and that plaintiffs claim against defendants Pidlypchak and Calescibetta, related t o the posting of grievances in the mess hall, be dismissed, but that the remaining three retaliation causes of action, against defendants Calescibetta, Letourneau, French, and Harrington, be referred for trial based upon the existence of genuinely di sputed issues of material fact which must be resolved before those claims can be adjudicated. Objections to R&R due by 3/25/2009 Case Review Deadline 3/31/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 3/11/09. {report-recommendations served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2009

Filing 103 ORDER that 102 Report and Recommendations is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED granting in part and denying in part 45 Motion for Summary Judgment. ORDERED that plaintiff's retaliation claim relating to his termination from emp loyment in the prison mess hall survive Defendants' motion for summary judgment and be referred for trial, along with Plaintiff's two retaliation claims relating to his keeplock confinement. Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/31/09. {order served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas)

March 11, 2009

Filing 102 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. RECOMMENDED that 45 Motion for Summary Judgment to the extent that it relates to the remaining retaliation claims, be GRANTED, in part, and that plaintiffs claim against defendants Pidlypchak and Calescibetta, related t o the posting of grievances in the mess hall, be dismissed, but that the remaining three retaliation causes of action, against defendants Calescibetta, Letourneau, French, and Harrington, be referred for trial based upon the existence of genuinely di sputed issues of material fact which must be resolved before those claims can be adjudicated. Objections to R&R due by 3/25/2009 Case Review Deadline 3/31/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 3/11/09. {report-recommendations served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gill v. Calescibetta, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?