Pasciuti v. Drew
| Charles Pasciuti |
| Darryl D. Drew |
| 9:2004cv00043 |
| January 20, 2004 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Lawrence E Kahn |
| Randolph F Treece |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by Darryl D. Drew. (Roberts, Charles) |
Filing 22
ORDER to Show Cause, within 30 days of the date of this Order, why the case or documents cannot be unsealed. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 12/30/09. (ban)
|
| Appeal Record Returned: #19 Notice of Appeal (nas) |
| Filing 21 MANDATE of USCA: granting respondent-appellee's dismissal of appeal because the appeal is moot. (see) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Docketing Record on Appeal from USCA re #19 Notice of Appeal filed by Charles Pasciuti. USCA Case Number 04/4039 pr (nas) |
| USCA Case Number is 04-4039-pr for #19 Notice of Appeal filed by Charles Pasciuti. (cbm, ) |
| Certified and Transmitted Index to Record on appeal with paper copies of record on appealto US Court of Appeals re #19 Notice of Appeal (kcl, ) |
| Transmission of Notice of Appeal and Docket Sheet to US Court of Appeals re #19 Notice of Appeal (cbm, ) |
| Appeal Filing fee: $ 255.00, receipt number 76470 (alh) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #18 Judgment by Charles Pasciuti. (Attachments: #1)(Caplan, Alan) |
| Filing 18 JUDGMENT in favor of respondent against petitioner in accordance with the Memorandum - Decision of Judge Kahn filed on 6/2/04 (nas) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER denying #8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. ORDERED that Pascuiti's petition pursuant to 28 USC Sect. 2241 is DENIED AND DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 6/2/04. (nas)
|
| Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 First MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Charles Pasciuti. (Caplan, Alan) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting Attorney Caplan on behalf of Pasciuti permission to file a reply to #8 First MOTION for Preliminary Injunction that shall not exceed 10 pages in length and shall be filed by midnight on 5/25/04. Signed by M.A.C. as directed by Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 5/25/04. (nas)
|
| Filing 14 Proposed Order re: petr's #13 motion for Leave to File Reply.(Caplan, Alan) Modified on 5/25/2004 to reflect that this document is a proposed order, not a separate motion (cbm, ). |
| Filing 13 First MOTION Leave to File Reply to Government's response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Charles Pasciuti.(Caplan, Alan) |
| Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in response to reply and motion for preliminary injunction filed by Darryl D. Drew. (Attachments: #1 #2)(Roberts, Charles) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER that Respondent respond to petitioner's motion for preliminary injunction within 20 days of the filing of this Order; ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for an order to show cause is DENIED. Signed by Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 5/7/04. (nas)
|
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OF LAW re #8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Charles Pasciuti. (Caplan, Alan) |
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT in Support re #8 First MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Charles Pasciuti. (Caplan, Alan) |
| Filing 8 First MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Charles Pasciuti.(Caplan, Alan) |
| Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OF LAW re #5 Response to Habeas Petition filed by Charles Pasciuti. (Caplan, Alan) |
| Filing 6 SEALED DOCUMENT - maintained in Clerk's Office and not available for electronic viewing (wjg, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/9/2010: #1 Order) (ban, ). |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Darryl D. Drew. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Scannell Declaration)(Roberts, Charles) |
| Filing 4 RETURN RECEIPT for Habeas Corpus Petition received as to Darryl D. Drew served on 2/2/2004, answer due 4/2/2004. (ljr, ) |
| Filing 3 RETURN RECEIPT received as to U.S.Attorney's Office served on 2/2/04 (ljr, ) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER, directing response to the Habeas Corpus Petition; response due 60 days from date of service. re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Charles Pasciuti (Order and Petition served by Certified Mail). Signed by Judge Randolph F. Treece on 1/29/04. (ljr, )
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee Receipt #73657 $5.) , filed by Charles Pasciuti.(ljr, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 1/20/2004 (ljr, ). Additional attachment(s) added on 1/20/2004 (ljr, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Pasciuti v. Drew | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Charles Pasciuti | |
| Represented By: | Alan P. Caplan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Darryl D. Drew | |
| Represented By: | Charles E. Roberts |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
