Richardson v. Artus

Richardson v. Artus

Case Number:	9:2005cv01419
Filed:	November 14, 2005
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Prisoner Office
Presiding Judge:	George H. Lowe
Presiding Judge:	Gary L. Sharpe
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 29, 2010	Filing 30 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the 26 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED, that the 1 Petition is DENIED and DISMISSED in its entirety. ORDERED, that a Certificate of Appealability not issue with respec t to any of the claims set forth in the Petition, because Petitioner has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of aconstitutional right" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/29/10. (Decision and Order served on petitioner by regular mail) (alh, )
September 22, 2009	Filing 26 REPORT, RECOMMENDATION and ORDER: RECOMMENDED, that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED and DISMISSED as Petitioner has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2 253(c)(2). RECOMMENDED, that no certificate of appealability issue with respect to any of Petitioner's claims. Objections to R&R due by 10/6/2009 Case Review Deadline 10/13/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge George H. Lowe on 9/22/09. (Report Recommendation and Order served on petitioner by regular mail with copies of the electronically-available-only opinions cited in the Report, Recommendation and Order.)(alh, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 29, 2010

Filing 30 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the 26 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED, that the 1 Petition is DENIED and DISMISSED in its entirety. ORDERED, that a Certificate of Appealability not issue with respec t to any of the claims set forth in the Petition, because Petitioner has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of aconstitutional right" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 3/29/10. (Decision and Order served on petitioner by regular mail) (alh, )

September 22, 2009

Filing 26 REPORT, RECOMMENDATION and ORDER: RECOMMENDED, that the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED and DISMISSED as Petitioner has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2 253(c)(2). RECOMMENDED, that no certificate of appealability issue with respect to any of Petitioner's claims. Objections to R&R due by 10/6/2009 Case Review Deadline 10/13/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge George H. Lowe on 9/22/09. (Report Recommendation and Order served on petitioner by regular mail with copies of the electronically-available-only opinions cited in the Report, Recommendation and Order.)(alh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richardson v. Artus
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?