Gordon v. Watts et al

Gordon v. Watts et al

Case Number:	9:2006cv00450
Filed:	April 10, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Prisoner Office
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence E. Kahn
Presiding Judge:	David E. Peebles
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 24, 2009	Filing 44 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the 43 Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY. ORDERED, that this case is DISMISSED based upon Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and to comply with this Court's Orders and Local Rules, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Northern District of New York Local Rule 41.2(b). ORDERED, that Defendants' 23 Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 3/24/09. (Order served on the Clerk of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, where Plaintiff has an appeal pending and on Plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
February 27, 2009	Filing 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: RECOMMENDED, that this action be DISMISSED based upon plaintiff's failure to prosecute and to comply with this court's orders and local rules practice, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedu re and Northern District of New York Local Rule 41.2(b). RECOMMENDED, that if this Report and Recommendation is accepted, then a copy of the dismissal order be forwarded to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, where plaintiff's appeal is pending. Objections to R&R due by 3/13/2009 Case Review Deadline 3/19/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 2/27/09. (Report and Recommendations forwarded to Plaintiff at his last known address) (alh, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 24, 2009

Filing 44 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the 43 Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY. ORDERED, that this case is DISMISSED based upon Plaintiff's failure to prosecute and to comply with this Court's Orders and Local Rules, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Northern District of New York Local Rule 41.2(b). ORDERED, that Defendants' 23 Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 3/24/09. (Order served on the Clerk of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, where Plaintiff has an appeal pending and on Plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )

February 27, 2009

Filing 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: RECOMMENDED, that this action be DISMISSED based upon plaintiff's failure to prosecute and to comply with this court's orders and local rules practice, pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedu re and Northern District of New York Local Rule 41.2(b). RECOMMENDED, that if this Report and Recommendation is accepted, then a copy of the dismissal order be forwarded to the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, where plaintiff's appeal is pending. Objections to R&R due by 3/13/2009 Case Review Deadline 3/19/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 2/27/09. (Report and Recommendations forwarded to Plaintiff at his last known address) (alh, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gordon v. Watts et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?