LaRose v. Payant

LaRose v. Payant

Case Number:	9:2006cv00466
Filed:	April 14, 2006
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office:	Prisoner Office
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence E. Kahn
Presiding Judge:	David E. Peebles
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 28, 2009	Filing 21 DECISION and ORDER accepting and adopting 20 Report and Recommendations in its entirety; ORDERED that Petitioner's 1 Petition is DENIED and DISMISSED in its entirety; ORDERED that a certificate of appealability not issue with respect to any of the claims set forth in the Petition, because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 7/28/2009. {Decision & Order served on petitioner via regular mail} (mgh)
June 9, 2009	Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED that the petition in this matter be DENIED and DISMISSED in all regards; RECOMMENDED, based upon the finding that LaRose has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" pur suant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), that a certificate of appealability not issue with respect to any of the claims set forth in his position. Objections to R&R due by 6/23/2009 Case Review Deadline 6/29/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 6/9/2009. {Report & Recommendation served on petitioner via regular mail} (mgh)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 28, 2009

Filing 21 DECISION and ORDER accepting and adopting 20 Report and Recommendations in its entirety; ORDERED that Petitioner's 1 Petition is DENIED and DISMISSED in its entirety; ORDERED that a certificate of appealability not issue with respect to any of the claims set forth in the Petition, because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Signed by Judge Glenn T. Suddaby on 7/28/2009. {Decision & Order served on petitioner via regular mail} (mgh)

June 9, 2009

Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED that the petition in this matter be DENIED and DISMISSED in all regards; RECOMMENDED, based upon the finding that LaRose has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" pur suant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), that a certificate of appealability not issue with respect to any of the claims set forth in his position. Objections to R&R due by 6/23/2009 Case Review Deadline 6/29/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 6/9/2009. {Report & Recommendation served on petitioner via regular mail} (mgh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LaRose v. Payant
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?