Walter v. Lape
Case Number: 9:2006cv00558
Filed: May 8, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
Presiding Judge: David N. Hurd
Presiding Judge: David E. Peebles
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 DECISION and ORDER accepting and adopting in whole the 18 Report- Recommendation; ORDERED that, the petition of Robert Walter is DENIED and DISMISSED; A Certificate of Appealability will not be issued in this matter. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 9/2/2009. {Decision & Order served on petitioner via regular mail} (mgh)
June 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED that the petition in this matter be DENIED and DISMISSED in all respects; RECOMMENDED, based upon the finding that Walter has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right" pu rsuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), that a certificate of appealability not issue with respect to the claim set forth in his petition. Objections to R&R due by 7/10/2009 Case Review Deadline 7/15/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 6/25/2009. {Report & Recommendation served on petitioner via regular mail} (mgh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walter v. Lape
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?