McDowell v. Stewart, et al.
9:2006cv01060 |
September 1, 2006 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Prisoner Office |
David R. Homer |
Gary L. Sharpe |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: RECOMMENDED that defendants' 64 Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED as to McDowell's claims for insufficient notice, false misbehavior report, and the Equal Protection Clause claim for failing to charge Martin with a disciplinary violation, and DENIED in all other respects. Objections to R&R due by 9/11/2009 Case Review Deadline 9/16/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Homer on 8/27/09. (Report-Recommendation and Order served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, ) |
Filing 53 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the 49 MOTION to Dismiss amended complaint filed by Daniel Stewart be GRANTED; ORDERED that the 50 Letter Motion from Richard Lombardo for Daniel Stewart is GRANTED; ORDERED that the Clerk terminate the 23 First MOTION to Dismiss filed by Daniel Stewart. Objections to R&R due by 2/21/2008 Case Review Deadline 2/26/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Homer on 2/6/08. (rjb, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: McDowell v. Stewart, et al. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.