McDowell v. Stewart, et al.
Case Number: 9:2006cv01060
Filed: September 1, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
Presiding Judge: David R. Homer
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Sharpe
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 71 REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: RECOMMENDED that defendants' 64 Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED as to McDowell's claims for insufficient notice, false misbehavior report, and the Equal Protection Clause claim for failing to charge Martin with a disciplinary violation, and DENIED in all other respects. Objections to R&R due by 9/11/2009 Case Review Deadline 9/16/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Homer on 8/27/09. (Report-Recommendation and Order served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
February 6, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 53 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS that the 49 MOTION to Dismiss amended complaint filed by Daniel Stewart be GRANTED; ORDERED that the 50 Letter Motion from Richard Lombardo for Daniel Stewart is GRANTED; ORDERED that the Clerk terminate the 23 First MOTION to Dismiss filed by Daniel Stewart. Objections to R&R due by 2/21/2008 Case Review Deadline 2/26/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Homer on 2/6/08. (rjb, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McDowell v. Stewart, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?