Messa v. Woods et al
| Rafael Messa |
| R. K. Woods, J. Hyde, N. Guerin, M. Kemp, K. Eddy, D. Buffham and P. Dabiew |
| 9:2007cv00306 |
| March 23, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Clinton |
| David N. Hurd |
| David E. Peebles |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
DECISION and ORDER: ORDERED that, the 51 Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects; Defendants' 44 motion for partial summary judgment is GRANTED, in part; All of plaintiff's claims against defendants Woods and Buffham are DISMISSED; Defendants' motion otherwise is DENIED; A trial date will be issued in due course. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 9/23/2009. {Decision & Order served on plaintiff via regular mail} (mgh)
|
|
Filing
51
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED, that defendants' 44 motion for partial summary judgment be GRANTED, in part, and that all of plaintiff's claims against defendants Woods and Buffham be DISMISSED, but that defendants' motion otherwise be DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 8/13/2009 Case Review Deadline 8/19/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 7/30/2009. {Report & Recommendation served on plaintiff via regular mail}(mgh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
