Williams v. Onondaga County Justice Center et al
| Charles Williams |
| Onondaga County Justice Center, Onondaga County, Syracuse Police Department, Zok, Berella, Isykk, Quinn, Bouchie, Kevin Murphy, Uzinoff, Proud and Officer Babbage |
| 9:2007cv00789 |
| August 1, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Onondaga |
| David N. Hurd |
| David E. Peebles |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER adopting 28 Report-Recommendation and Order in all respects. ORDERED, that the 16 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and the plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with leave to replead. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 4/1/09. (Order served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
28
REPORT, RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: Recommended that defendants' 16 MOTION to Dismiss be GRANTED, and that plaintiff's complaint in this action be DISMISSED in all respects, with leave to replead. ORDERED, that plaintiff's request (Dk t. No. 25) that Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles recuse himself in connection with the action is DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 2/5/2009 Case Review Deadline 2/11/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 1/22/09. (Report, Recommendation and Order served on non-ecf party by regular mail)(alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
