Harnett v. Tetreault et al
| Timothy Harnett |
| K.D. Tetreault, Dale Artus, S. Bruso, Lt. Lacey, T. Broursseau, D. LaClair, Lawrence Sears, Thomas G. Eagen, Glenn S. Goord, Paul M. Knapp, Dupry, J. Tedford, G. La Ponte, Bushy, John Doe and John DOE 2 |
| 9:2007cv00952 |
| September 14, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Wyoming |
| Gary L. Sharpe |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's status as proceeding in forma pauperis be revoked because Plaintiff has brought on three or more occasions, actions which have been dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and because h e has not alleged in this action that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. RECOMMENDED that plaintiff's amended complaint (dkt no. 5) be conditionally dismissed until such time as plaintiff has paid the entire $350.00 filin g fee. RECOMMENDED, that if Plaintiff does not submit the $350.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days from the date this Report-Recommendation is adopted, his Complaint be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 8/31/2009 Case Review Deadline 9/8/2009 Signed by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece on 8/17/09. {report-recommendations served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
