Edwards v. Bezio et al
| Mark Edwards |
| Sgt. Bezio, C.O. Lapage, C.O. LaFey, C.O. Carrons and C.O. Reif |
| 9:2008cv00256 |
| March 6, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Chemung |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| Randolph F. Treece |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 45 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 36 ) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against LaPage and Bezio are DISMISSED; ORDERED, that Plaintiff's claims against LaFey are DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 2/24/10. (order served on plaintiff by regular mail) (mnc)
|
|
Filing
45
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION and ORDER: RECOMMENDED, that the Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 36 ) be GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against LaPage and Bezio be DISMISSED; RECOMMENDED, that the Plaintiff's claims ag ainst C.O. LaFey be DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). Objections to R&R due by 2/19/2010 Case Review Deadline 2/26/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Randolph F. Treece on 2/5/10. (report-recommendation and order served on plaintiff by regular mail)(mnc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
