McCloud v. Roy et al
| Christopher McCloud |
| Richard Roy, Christopher Turriglio, Mr. Behrle, Philip Heath, Mr. Mizgala, Mrs. Smith, New York State Department of Corrections and Jane/John Does |
| 9:2008cv00839 |
| August 4, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Ulster |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the 55 Report-Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED, that Plaintiff's 36 , 38 , and 43 Motions for Partial Summary Judgment are DENIED. ORDERED, that Defendants' 49 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. ORDERED, that Plaintiff's 1 Complaint in this action is DISMISSED in its entirety. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 3/16/10. (Decision and Order served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
55
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED, that plaintiff's 36 , 38 , and 43 Motions for Partial Summary Judgment be DENIED. RECOMMENDED, that defendants' 49 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED, and the complaint be DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Objections to R&R due by 3/8/2010 Case Review Deadline 3/15/2010. Signed by US Magistrate Judge Andrew T. Baxter on 2/22/10. (Report-Recommendation served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
