Walter v. Fischer et al
| Lawrence J. Walter |
| Brian Fischer, John H. Nutall, Dwight Bradford and S. Spurgeon |
| 9:2008cv00908 |
| August 25, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Oneida |
| Norman A. Mordue |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the 28 Report and Recommendation is adopted and accepted in all respects; ORDERED that 19 defendants' motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed on the merits under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6); ORDERED that plaintiff's 24 motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order is denied. Signed by Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue on 9/28/2009. {Memorandum-Decision & Order served on plaintiff via regular mail} (mgh)
|
|
Filing
28
REPORT-RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER: RECOMMENDED that 19 defendants' motion to dismiss be GRANTED and that the complaint be dismissed in its entirety as to all claims and all defendants; ORDERED that Walter's 25 request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 8/11/2009 Case Review Deadline 8/17/2009 Signed by Magistrate Judge David R. Homer on 7/28/2009. {Report Recommendation & Order served on plaintiff via regular mail}(mgh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
