Carter v. Kuc et al
David Carter |
P. Kuc, J. Baney, Sgt. Christopher, Glenn Goord and Auburn Jail and Medical |
9:2008cv00947 |
September 8, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
Clinton |
Gustave J. DiBianco |
Norman A. Mordue |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the 36 Report and Recommendation is accepted in part and rejected in part; ORDERED that the 10 dismissal motion by defendants Goord and Auburn Jail and Medical is granted and all causes of action agains t these defendants will be dismissed unless within 30 days of the date of this Memorandum-Decision and Order, plaintiff serves and files an amended complaint in accordance with this decision. Signed by Chief Judge Norman A. Mordue on 9/16/2009. {Memorandum-Decision and Order served on plaintiff via regular mail} (mgh) |
Filing 36 REPORT-RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED, that defendants' 10 motion to dismiss be GRANTED, and the complaint DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY as against defendants GOORD and "AUBURN JAIL AND MEDICAL." Objections to R&R due by 9/15/2009 Case Review Deadline 9/21/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gustave J. DiBianco on 8/31/2009. {Report-Recommendation served on plaintiff via regular mail}(mgh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.