Fowlkes v. Rodriquez et al
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes |
Rodriquez, Edward M. Adler, Dennis Breslin, Chauncey G. Parker, Kenneth J. Connolly, Gerard Murphy, Kimberly Szady, Scott Steinhardt, Lorraine Felegy, Unknown Named Employees of NYC DCJS Sex Offender Rregistry Unit, Glenn S. Goord, Robert Loveridge, Harold Smith, Anthony Patricelli, Johnny Mae, Aldrich, Daniel Keating and Unknown Named Members of Troy City Police Department |
9:2008cv01198 |
November 7, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Lawrence E. Kahn |
David E. Peebles |
Defendant |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 120 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 115 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY. ORDERED, that Plaintiff's IFP status be revoked and that his Complaint (Dkt. No. 2 ) be conditionally dismissed unless, withi n thirty (30) days of the filing of this Order, he pays the applicable $350 filing fee in full. ORDERED, that if Plaintiff pays the full filing fee within the required time period, the Clerk is directed to return the file to the Court for review of the pending Motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 106 ). Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 10/11/11. (served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, ) |
Filing 102 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 98 ) is approved and adopted in its entirety; ORDERED, that the Motion of Defendants Parker, Connolly, Murphy and Felegy for judgment on the pleadings dismissing all claims agains t them in this action (Dkt. No. 81 ) is granted, and that all claims against those Defendants set forth in Plaintiff's Complaint are dismissed. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 1/4/11. (order served on plaintiff by regular mail) (mnc) |
Filing 98 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED, that the motion of defendants Parker, Connolly, Murphy and Felegy for judgment on the pleadings dismissing all claims against them in this action (Dkt. No. 81 ) be GRANTED, and that all claims against those de fendants set forth in plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED. Objections to R&R due by 12/23/2010 Case Review Deadline 12/30/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 11/9/10. (report-recommendation served on plaintiff by regular mail)(mnc) |
Filing 76 DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that the 71 Report-Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED in PART and MODIFIED in PART; ORDERED, that 61 Plaintiff's Motion for amendment of the judgment in this matter is DENIED; ORDERED, that 67 Plaintiff's Motion for this Court's recusal in this matter is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 2/3/2009. {Decision & Order served on Plaintiff via regular mail} (mgh) |
Filing 71 REPORT RECOMMENDATION and ORDER: RECOMMENDED, that plaintiff's motion for amendment of the judgment in this matter 61 be held in abeyance, and that this court defer a ruling on that matter until the Second Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a decision in connection with plaintiff's appeal; RECOMMENDED that Senior District Judge Lawrence E. Kahn deny plaintiff's application for his recusal in this matter 67 ; ORDERED, that plaintiff's request that I recuse myself in this action 67 is hereby DENIED. Objections to R&R due by 1/20/2009 Case Review Deadline 1/26/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 1/5/2009. {Report Recommendation & Order served on Plaintiff via regular mail}.(mgh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.