McCowan v. Haggett
Petitioner: Antonio McCowan
Respondent: William Haggett
Case Number: 9:2008cv01255
Filed: November 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Saratoga
Presiding Judge: David R. Homer
Presiding Judge: Gary L. Sharpe
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER denying petitioner's 16 Motion for Reconsideration & further ordered that it declines to issue COA. Any further request for COA must be addressed by 2nd CCA; Signed by District Judge James K. Singleton dtd 9/11/09 (cml) [ CRD traditionally served upon non-NEF petitioner @ Albany County Jail ]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCowan v. Haggett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Antonio McCowan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Haggett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?