Decker v. Hogan et al
| Michael L. Decker |
| Michael F. Hogan and Donald Sawyer |
| 9:2009cv00239 |
| February 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Oneida |
| Gustave J. DiBianco |
| Thomas J. McAvoy |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
DECISION & ORDER: The Court adopts the 21 Report-Recommendations for the reasons stated therein. ORDERED, that Defendants' 17 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and the complaint is DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO NOTIFY THE COURT OF HIS CHANGE OF ADDRE SS AND FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Defendants and to close the file in this matter. adopting Report and Recommendations re 21 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 9/1/10. (Decision and Order served on plaintiff by regular mail at his last known address of record with the Court)(alh, )
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that defendants' 8 Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part as set forth herein. ORDERED, that plaintiff's 3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied. ORDERED, that defendants file an answer to the complaint no later than 10/31/09. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 9/28/09. (Memorandum-Decision and Order served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
