White v. Fischer et al
| Jason R. White |
| Brian Fischer, Theresa A. Knapp-David and R. Woods |
| 9:2009cv00240 |
| February 27, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Wyoming |
| David N. Hurd |
| David E. Peebles |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
16
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the 15 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. ORDERED, that defendant's 10 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. ORDERED, that plaintiff's complaint in this action is DISMISSED without leave to replead. ORDERED, that the Clerk is directed to file judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 2/18/10. (Decision and Order served on plaintiff by regular mail) (alh, )
|
|
Filing
15
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: RECOMMENDED, that defendants' 10 MOTION to Dismiss be GRANTED, and that plaintiff's complaint in this action be DISMISSED, without leave to replead. ORDERED, that pending final determination on defendants' dismissal motion, discovery in this action be and hereby is STAYED. Objections to R&R due by 2/8/2010 Case Review Deadline 2/16/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles on 1/25/2010. (Report and Recommendation served on plaintiff by regular mail)(alh, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
