Williams v. Artus
Petitioner: Robert Williams
Respondent: Dale A. Artus
Case Number: 9:2009cv00419
Filed: April 9, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: St. Lawrence
Presiding Judge: Glenn T. Suddaby
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying and dismissing the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Robert Williams. A Certificate of Appealability will not be issued by this Court. Signed by Senior Judge Thomas J. McAvoy on 8/20/2010. (amt) [Petitioner served via reg. mail]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Artus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Robert Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Dale A. Artus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?