Loadholt v. Jane Doe/John Doe
Ronald Loadholt |
Jane Doe/John Doe |
9:2009cv00658 |
June 8, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
Prisoner Office |
Erie |
Lawrence E. Kahn |
Randolph F. Treece |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 38 ) is approved and adopted; ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 28 ) is granted, and Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 9 ) is dismissed. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 3/25/2011. (served plaintiff by regular mail) (mnc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Loadholt v. Jane Doe/John Doe | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ronald Loadholt | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jane Doe/John Doe | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.