Ford v. Fischer et al
| Corey Ford |
| Brian Fischer, Joseph T. Smith, John Maly and Ms. Parisi |
| 9:2009cv00723 |
| June 24, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Ulster |
| Gustave J. DiBianco |
| David N. Hurd |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED that 82 Report-Recommendation is MODIFIED; Defendants' 74 motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; and the complaint is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 10/2/12. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
|
|
Filing
46
DECISION and ORDER: The 43 Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects. ORDERED that the defendants' motion to dismiss (Docket No. 32 ) is DENIED with respect to the First Amendment claim against defendants John Maly an d Joseph T. Smith relating to the continuation of the mail watch against plaintiff in 2008 and 2009; The defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED with respect to the First Amendment claim against defendant Joseph T. Smith relating to his refusal to permit plaintiff to marry;Defendants' motion is GRANTED with respect to all other defendants and claims; Plaintiff's second amended complaint is DISMISSED with respect to all other defendants and claims. Signed by Judge David N. Hurd on 3/9/11. {order served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
