Winfield v. Bishop et al
| Joaquin R. Winfield |
| John Doe Bishop, David LeClair and Nancy Machell |
| 9:2009cv01055 |
| September 16, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of New York |
| Prisoner Office |
| Chemung |
| Lawrence E. Kahn |
| George H. Lowe |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
165
DECISION and ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 158 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED, that Plaintiff Joaquin Winfield's Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 38 ) is DISMISSED with prejudice. ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Appeals (Dkt. Nos. 128 ; 155 ) are DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 1/16/15. {order served via regular mail on plaintiff}(nas)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 92 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion (Dkt. No. 77 ) for summary judgment as to the due process claims against Defendant Marocco is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED, that Defandant Marocco is DISMISSED from this action; and it is further ORDERED, that Defendants' Motion (Dkt. No. 77 ) for summary judgment as to the excessive-force claim against Defendant Bishop is DENIED; and it is further ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court provide Plaintiff with copies of all unpublished decisions cited in the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 92 ). Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 9/3/2013. (ptm) (Copy served on Plaintiff with copies of all unpublished decisions cited in the Report-Recommendation Dkt. No. 92 ).
|
|
Filing
69
DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 65 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY. ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss the claims against Defendant LaClair and to reinstate the original complaint ( Dkt. No. 57 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. ORDERED that all claims against Defendant LaClair be DISMISSED without leave to amend. ORDERED that the request to reinstate the original Complaint is DENIED. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 5/10/12. {order served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas)
|
|
Filing
52
DECISION and ORDER: ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 46 ) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; ORDERED, that (1) Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against Defendant LeClair is dismissed without leave to amend; (2) Plaintif f's claim regarding the loss of video recording is dismissed without leave to amend; and (3) Plaintiff's equal protection claim against Defendant LeClair is dismissed without leave to amend. ORDERED, that Defendant LeClair is directed to r espond to Plaintiff'sretaliation claim within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Order. ORDERED, that Defendants Bishop and Marocco are directed to respond to the amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the filing date of this Order. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 10/28/11. {order served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER that 22 Report and Recommendations is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its entirety. ORDERED, that Defendant LeClair's Motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 14) is GRANTED without leave to amend the due process claim but with leave to amend the Eighth Amen dment claim; ORDERED, that Plaintiff's respondeat superior claim against Defendant LeClair is DISMISSED sua sponte without leave to amend; ORDERED, that Plaintiff's claims that Defendant LeClair did not respond to his grievances is DISMISSED sua sponte with leave to amend. Signed by Senior Judge Lawrence E. Kahn on 7/12/10. {order served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
