Williams v. Raimo et al
Plaintiff: Sean Williams
Defendant: E. Raimo, J. Smith, T. Vedder and J. Oliver
Case Number: 9:2010cv00245
Filed: March 3, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Office: Prisoner Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: George H. Lowe
Presiding Judge: Glenn T. Suddaby
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 118 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER denying 74 Motion in Limine; denying 80 Motion in Limine; granting 113 Motion in Limine: The Court hereby ORDERS that Defendants' motion in limine is DENIED; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff' ;s motion in limine to preclude the introduction of exhibitsreferencing the previous denials of grievances (Dkt. No. 80) is DENIED without prejudice to renew; and the Court further ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion in limine to preclude Defendants from offering any testimony regarding Plaintiff's prior criminal history (Dkt. No. 113) is GRANTED; and the Court furtherORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall serve of copy of this Memorandum-Decision and Order on all parties in accordance with the Local Rules. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 10/15/12. (ban)
December 2, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 54 MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER: ORDERS that Magistrate Judge Lowe's July 22, 2011 Report-Recommendation and Order is ADOPTED in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. ORDERS that Plaintiff's claim of intentional infliction of emotiona l distress is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. ORDERS that Plaintiff's motion to withdraw his objections to Magistrate Judge Lowe's July 22, 2011 Report-Recommendation and Order (Dkt. No. 53) is DENIED as moot. Signed by U.S. District Judge Mae A. D'Agostino on 12/2/11. {order served via regular mail on all non-ecf parties}(nas )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Raimo et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sean Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Raimo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Vedder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: J. Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?